BEON.tech

FAQ - Preguntas Frecuentes

Why Latin America - Timezone advantages, cultural fit, cost benefits, quality of talent

Why Latin America

To find remote developers across different Latin American countries, treat the whole region as one integrated talent pool rather than hiring country by country:

1.Search region-wide, not city-limited
◦Remote work and compatible time zones with the U.S. mean you can recruit across 15–20+ LATAM countries at once, instead of restricting to a single city or office.
2.Use specialized LATAM-focused talent partners
◦Work with companies whose model is to recruit and manage remote engineers across the region, prioritizing performance over location.
◦These firms already have large, pre-screened databases (e.g., tens of thousands of candidates) and recruiting teams dedicated to sourcing across LATAM.
3.Leverage standardized rates and conditions
◦Compensation for top engineers is now relatively standardized across LATAM; developers know regional market rates due to remote work and cross-border hiring.
◦This lets you set clear regional salary bands instead of per-country tables, making it easier to scale.
4.Optimize for time zone and performance
◦Filter only by:
◦Time zone compatibility with your team (all of LATAM works well for U.S. hours).
◦Skills, seniority, and track record, rather than country of residence.
5.Use structured sourcing and screening
◦Maintain a central LATAM talent database.
◦Continuously source from all major markets (Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Colombia, etc.) while running standardized technical and cultural assessments.

Companies like BEON.tech apply this model with around 150 developers spread across all countries in LATAM and a screened database of roughly 50,000 candidates, enabling fast, region-wide remote hiring.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

A remote development team in Latin America can typically be assembled and onboarded in about 3–4 weeks.

In the first 2–7 days you can expect to start interviewing 1–3 highly filtered candidates per role. Once you select someone, standard notice periods in LATAM are about 2–3 weeks, so engineers usually start within a month. For faster scaling (e.g., 15–20 engineers per month), opening the search to all of Latin America instead of a single country like Argentina significantly speeds things up.

Companies like BEON.tech maintain around 150 developers spread across all countries in LATAM, supported by a 15-person recruiting team and a screened database of ~50,000 candidates, enabling quick team assembly on this timeline.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Not necessarily. Argentina is not clearly the most cost-effective country for hiring developers in Latin America: rates for top engineers are now quite standardized in USD across LATAM due to remote work and a shared talent market. Countries like Brazil, Colombia, Peru, and others typically show similar salary ranges, and at the moment Argentina can even be relatively expensive in dollar terms.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Free public university education in Argentina helps create a large pool of engineers, but it is not the sole reason they are good. The quality comes from a combination of factors: accessible higher education, strong technical curricula, and rigorous vetting and selection by companies that focus on attracting top performers rather than just hiring in volume.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Brazil currently offers the deepest nearshore software engineering talent pool in LATAM, while Mexico provides strong talent with broader English proficiency and a longer nearshoring track record.

•Scale and availability: Brazil is the largest source, with BEON having around 13,000 screened Brazilian candidates and Brazil becoming its #1 country by engineer headcount in just a few years. Roughly half of BEON’s around 150 developers spread across all countries in LATAM are in Brazil.
•Mexico’s position: Mexico is typically BEON’s #2 or #3 country in headcount, with about 3,400 screened candidates. It has a long history as a nearshore destination, strong engineering culture, and widespread English/Spanish bilingualism, making communication and U.S. collaboration easier.
•Quality: Both countries provide top‑tier, Silicon-Valley‑compatible engineers; the main trade‑off is Brazil’s larger volume vs. Mexico’s language advantages and established nearshore reputation.

In practice, many companies target both: Brazil for maximum senior talent density and Mexico for language, cultural proximity, and nearshore maturity.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

For most US companies, Brazil and broader Latin America are usually a better fit than Pakistan when hiring remote developers.

Key reasons:

•Time zone alignment: Brazil and the rest of LATAM are in compatible time zones with the US, which makes real-time collaboration, calls, and rapid issue resolution much easier. Pakistan is often 9–11 hours ahead, which creates friction for day‑to‑day coordination.
•Holiday and availability pattern: US and LATAM holiday calendars are more similar. Pakistan tends to have more and longer holiday periods, which can create gaps in coverage for US businesses expecting consistent availability.
•Talent pool and quality: Latin America, and Brazil in particular, provide a very large, mature pool of senior engineers and DevOps/network professionals, with strong English skills and cultural proximity to US teams.
•Rates: LATAM (including Brazil) is more expensive than Pakistan but still cheaper than US/Western Europe. For example, senior roles in Brazil can be around USD 8,000 per month, reflecting the higher cost for better time zone alignment and cultural fit.

In practice, Pakistan is cost‑effective but harder for synchronous collaboration; Brazil/LATAM cost more per engineer but generally deliver better alignment with US work hours, communication, and long‑term product collaboration.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Hiring developers in Central and South America offers several concrete benefits:

1.Time-zone alignment with U.S. teams
◦Most of LATAM is within 0–3 hours of U.S. time zones, enabling real-time collaboration, faster decisions, and fewer async bottlenecks compared with teams in Asia or Eastern Europe.
2.Material cost savings vs. U.S. hires
◦Total costs (salary plus benefits, taxes, etc.) are typically about 20–40% lower than equivalent U.S.-based talent, thanks to lower local cost of living, while still remaining competitive for developers.
3.High-quality, “Silicon Valley–compatible” talent
◦Developers often have strong experience with modern stacks, cloud platforms like AWS, and global products, not just local systems. Many are senior or mid‑senior level, capable of autonomous problem solving rather than requiring micromanagement.
4.Large, borderless talent pool
◦Strong engineering communities exist across Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Colombia, Central America (e.g., Costa Rica, Honduras, Nicaragua) and more. Remote work has effectively removed borders, so you can recruit across the region to match specific tech stacks and seniority needs.
5.Good English proficiency and communication
◦Many engineers in LATAM speak fluent English and are selected specifically for their ability to participate actively in calls, ask questions, and collaborate synchronously—not just read/write asynchronously.
6.Improved retention via long-term, career-oriented talent
◦Top LATAM engineers often value stability, growth opportunities, and long-term roles, which can lead to better retention when paired with clear career paths and stable products.
7.Scalable, flexible team structures
◦A common model is to keep a core technical leader in the U.S. (CTO, VP Eng, lead) and surround them with a LATAM engineering team, preserving strategic control while optimizing cost and coverage.

Companies like BEON.tech specialize in this by vetting top performers across around 150 developers spread across all countries in LATAM, focusing on English-fluent, mid‑to‑senior engineers and providing stable, dollar-based compensation and integrated benefits.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Software development centers in Latin America are set up where two main key criteria are met:

1.Lower political and economic risk than high‑risk neighbors
◦Countries must be significantly safer and more stable, from both political and economic standpoints, than places like Belarus (e.g., predictable regulations, no major sanctions risks, relative institutional stability).
2.Operational fit: time zone and talent pool
◦Must share a compatible time zone with the U.S. to enable real‑time collaboration.
◦Needs a large pool of top‑tier engineers so quality is not sacrificed for location.

When these conditions are satisfied—better economics than Poland, lower risk than Belarus, and strong, time‑zone‑aligned talent—the location is a candidate for a Latin American development center.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

US companies hiring remote developers from Eastern Europe often struggle with:

1.Time zone gaps, especially with the West Coast
◦Eastern Europe is typically 9–10 hours ahead of the US West Coast.
◦This leaves very little workday overlap, so engineers must stay late to attend meetings or collaborate in real time.
◦It becomes harder to run highly interactive, synchronous workflows (daily standups, pair programming, rapid feedback loops).
2.Scalability and sustainability of schedules
◦Relying on engineers to routinely work late evenings is difficult to sustain and makes it harder to scale teams.
◦Over time, this can affect productivity, retention, and willingness of senior talent to join such arrangements.
3.Coverage of client needs
◦With most engineers in Eastern Europe, supporting US clients across all time zones—especially West Coast—requires either shift work or partial handoffs to other regions, adding complexity to coordination and project management.
Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Hiring Latin American developers typically costs more than hiring in India but delivers higher quality, better time-zone overlap with U.S. teams, and stronger long-term integration.

Key differences:

•Rates and cost
◦India can be as low as ~20% of U.S. rates for basic work.
◦Top LATAM engineers are usually only ~30–40% cheaper than U.S. equivalents, not 80–90% cheaper. They often earn in the ~$7,500–$10,000/month range for 6–8+ years of experience, reflecting a focus on senior, top-performing talent rather than bargain rates.
•Quality and seniority
◦LATAM hiring in this model targets top performers, heavily vetted by senior technical leaders, with an emphasis on long-term roles and career growth.
◦Many companies move away from India for critical product roles due to perceived quality gaps and limited overlap with U.S. engineering hours, using Indian teams more for basic or narrowly scoped work.
•Time zone and collaboration
◦LATAM time zones are highly compatible with all U.S. time zones, enabling real-time collaboration, standups, and rapid feedback loops.
◦India usually requires working early mornings or late evenings for U.S. teams, which can slow communication and complicate testing, feedback, and agile ceremonies.
•Team structure and retention
◦A common high-performance setup is a U.S.-based lead (CTO/VP/lead engineer) surrounded by full-time LATAM developers who work as an integrated extension of the team.
◦Retention for top LATAM talent is supported by paying very high local salaries and offering stable, long-term engagements; the focus is on product commitment and cultural closeness, not short-term, low-cost contracting.

Companies like BEON.tech specialize in this LATAM model, providing around 150 developers spread across all countries in LATAM, serving roughly 35–40 U.S. companies with thoroughly vetted, full-time engineers in compatible time zones.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Expect a staff‑augmentation / subcontracting model rather than hiring individuals directly:

•Contract structure: You sign a Master Services Agreement (MSA) with the provider, not with each engineer. The provider recruits, employs, and legally hosts the engineers and “subcontracts” them to you, acting as an umbrella/proxy company across ~15 LATAM countries.
•Engagement type: Full‑time, long‑term roles (not short 2‑month gigs). Engineers integrate into your team and usually take day‑to‑day direction from your managers.
•Payment terms & fees: You pay a monthly per‑engineer rate (typical “sweet spot” for strong mid-level JavaScript engineers is around USD 7,000/month; more senior roles around USD 8,500/month). The provider’s margin is built into that rate, so you don’t pay a separate finder’s fee.
•Invoicing: You receive a single consolidated invoice from the provider regardless of how many engineers you have.
•Notice and onboarding times: Standard LATAM labor laws require 2–3 weeks’ notice for an engineer to leave their current employer. Combined with recruiting and interviews, expect ~4 weeks from decision to having someone start.
•Benefits and logistics: The provider handles local employment compliance, payroll in local currency/crypto if desired, equipment (e.g., shipping laptops), co‑working, internet stipends, and medical insurance to support retention.
•Equity: Engineers typically do not require equity to join. Equity or stock options, if offered, are usually added later once you’ve identified key long‑term contributors.
•Rate flexibility: Rates can be negotiated within a target budget; if a presented candidate is above your ceiling, the provider can search for profiles that fit your number.
Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

You can typically have a Latin American developer fully onboarded in about 3–4 weeks.

•In the first few days to first week, you start receiving a small, curated set of candidates (usually 2–4, not dozens).
•During weeks 1–2, you interview and select your preferred candidate. Most clients hire 1 out of every 3 candidates introduced.
•After you give a thumbs-up, local labor laws in LATAM usually require a 2–3 week notice period for the developer to leave their current job.
•This makes the total time from search to start date roughly 3–4 weeks for common roles (front-end, back-end, full-stack, etc.). Very niche roles can take longer, around 4–6 weeks.

Companies like BEON.tech typically work with around 150 developers spread across all countries in LATAM and can send first candidates within a few days, with a historical hire ratio of about 1 hire per 3 candidates.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Latin American software engineers leave otherwise stable local jobs when remote roles offer what they value most but are missing:

•Stronger career growth: Remote positions with U.S. and other top-tier companies give access to larger, tech-centric organizations, clearer career paths, and experience in the world’s leading markets.
•More interesting, modern work: They look for innovative projects, trendy technologies (e.g., React, Node, Ruby on Rails), and meaningful technical challenges instead of repetitive or overly simple tasks.
•Engineering-centric environments: They prefer working within solid engineering structures (VP of Engineering, peers to learn from) rather than reporting to non-technical CEOs in companies where tech is peripheral.
•Professional recognition and feedback: They want to feel valued, receive continuous feedback, and be surrounded by high-caliber peers.
•Competitive, standardized pay: With remote work normalized, compensation levels across LATAM have risen and standardized; top performers can earn closer to U.S.-aligned rates, often better than traditional local jobs.

Companies like BEON.tech specialize in this by connecting top LATAM engineers with IT-centric U.S. companies, drawing from around 150 developers spread across all countries in LATAM and a screened database of about 30,000 candidates.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

A Latin American developer is considered a top performer when they combine:

•A solid university degree and outstanding technical skills in modern technologies.
•Strong problem‑solving ability and flexibility: they proactively bring solutions, not just issues.
•High ownership and low need for micromanagement.
•Clear, effective communication and strong collaboration with U.S.-based teams in overlapping time zones.
•A professional mindset that values stability, growth opportunities, and challenging, tech‑centric environments.

Companies like BEON.tech specialize in identifying this profile, having screened about 50,000 candidates, deeply vetted around 1,000 ready for interview, and maintaining around 150 developers spread across all countries in LATAM.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Companies can hire Latin American technical talent through three main service models:

1.End-to-end staff augmentation / EOR (proxy model)
◦The provider recruits, vets, and employs engineers anywhere in LATAM, handles payroll, equipment, logistics, and retention, and invoices the client with a single monthly bill.
◦Engineers work full-time, plug-and-play inside the client’s team, often on a contract-to-hire basis.
2.Contract-to-hire / long-term contracting
◦Engineers start under the provider’s umbrella as contractors embedded in the client’s team.
◦After a defined period, the client can convert the best performers to their own payroll.
3.Direct recruitment services
◦The provider acts purely as a recruiting firm: sources and filters candidates, delivers curated profiles, and the client hires them directly onto its own payroll and entities.
◦Typically used by companies that already know how to operate in LATAM and have local entities.

These services are built on a large, pre-vetted talent base across 15–20+ Latin American countries, with a strong focus on cultural fit, time-zone alignment, and retention through ongoing coaching and feedback. Companies like BEON.tech specialize in this model, with around 150 developers spread across all countries in LATAM, a screened database of about 30,000 candidates, and ~45 active U.S. and Canada-based clients.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Latin American development teams specialize in modern web and backend stacks such as Java, .NET, Ruby on Rails, PHP, and Node.js, and front-end development with JavaScript frameworks, especially React.

Increasingly, AI‑applied engineers—developers who are highly proficient with AI tooling and can embed AI capabilities into products—are becoming a must-have skill profile in LATAM, regardless of the core tech stack used.

Companies like BEON.tech focus on top-tier engineers in these technologies, with around 150 developers spread across all countries in LATAM covering back-end, front-end, QA, and related roles.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Latin American talent agencies can fill a wide range of roles for U.S. companies, primarily in technology and data:

•Senior and mid‑level software engineers (e.g., JavaScript/TypeScript and other modern stacks), typically with 5–10+ years of experience
•Data analysts and related data roles
•Technical support engineers (including higher tiers, like level‑7 tech support)
•Project coordinators and other tech‑adjacent roles
•Customer‑facing positions requiring near‑native English and strong written/oral communication

They recruit, deeply vet, and often employ these professionals in LATAM, then assign them full‑time to U.S. teams, either as direct hires, contract‑to‑hire, or via an employer‑of‑record/outsourced model, focusing on long‑term engagements rather than short, ad‑hoc gigs.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Brazil and Mexico are the largest and most important hubs for skilled remote developers in Latin America, with Brazil alone accounting for roughly half of the region’s available talent. There is strong developer talent across the rest of Latin America as well (e.g., Argentina, Colombia, Chile, Costa Rica), but smaller countries simply produce fewer professionals, so the deepest pools of experienced remote developers are found in the biggest countries, especially Brazil and Mexico.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Argentina is often chosen over India for outsourcing software development because it combines cost savings with real-time collaboration and senior talent quality:

•Time zone alignment with the U.S.: Argentina is in a U.S.-compatible time zone, enabling real-time communication, agile ceremonies, and faster decision-making. With India, large time differences often force asynchronous work and fewer overlapping hours.
•Cost–quality balance: While India can be cheaper, Latin America (including Argentina) offers mid-to-senior engineers typically in the US$7,000–9,500 per month range, allowing companies to maintain healthy margins compared to U.S. hires while accessing highly skilled, English-speaking engineers.
•Talent profile and stability: LATAM engineers are positioned as high-performing, long-term contributors who value stability and career growth, which reduces churn and preserves knowledge on critical projects.
•Cultural and working-style fit: Similar business culture and workday overlap with U.S. teams make collaboration smoother than with many Asian outsourcing hubs.

Companies like BEON.tech specialize in this model, providing around 150 developers spread across all countries in LATAM on a contract-to-hire basis, giving access to a large, senior talent pool in U.S.-aligned time zones.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Latin America is often a better fit than Eastern Europe when you need to move engineers out of Belarus/Ukraine risk zones while keeping costs under control for U.S. clients:

•Time zone alignment with the U.S.: Most of Latin America overlaps almost perfectly with U.S. working hours, enabling real‑time collaboration, standups, and faster feedback loops—something you lose with India/Asia and partially with Eastern Europe.
•Large, distributed talent pool: Hiring across all of LATAM (rather than one city or country) lets you optimize for quality and budget instead of being forced to overpay in a single expensive location or lower the talent bar.
•Risk diversification vs. Eastern Europe: Shifting from Belarus/Eastern Europe to multiple LATAM countries reduces geopolitical and operational concentration risk while keeping a similar or better quality level.

Companies like BEON.tech leverage this by maintaining around 150 developers spread across all countries in LATAM, all in U.S.-compatible time zones, focused on long‑term, high‑performance teams for U.S. clients.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Both Brazilian and Argentine developers are strong, but Brazil is becoming more popular mainly because its market is much larger, so the talent pool is bigger.

Spanish-speaking companies initially focused on Spanish-speaking countries, but as demand for top engineers grew, they opened searches to Brazil and quickly found so many high-caliber candidates that Brazilian hires ended up representing close to 40% of their LATAM engineering team. This is less about Brazilians being “better” than Argentines and more about scale: Brazil simply offers more developers with the desired profile, in the same time zone and cultural context, so it’s natural that many companies now source heavily from both countries, with Brazil providing a larger volume.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Companies often choose Brazilian (and broader Latin American) developers over Indian developers when:

1.Time zone alignment with the U.S.
◦Brazil is in a time zone closely aligned with the U.S., which allows real-time collaboration, quick calls, and faster feedback loops.
◦This is critical for product teams that need to “hop on a call, have a conversation, ask questions” during overlapping working hours.
2.Cultural proximity and communication style
◦Latin American engineers tend to have stronger cultural affinity and work-style similarity with U.S. teams than many offshore hubs, which can reduce friction in communication, expectations, and decision-making.
◦Many want to work specifically with U.S. and Canadian companies and integrate as part of a long-term product team, not as isolated contractors.
3.Quality and size of the talent pool vs. cost
◦Brazil has a very large, mature tech talent base with engineers experienced in modern stacks (JavaScript/React, .NET, Go, etc.).
◦While costs are higher than India in many cases, companies see the tradeoff as favorable when factoring in quality, reduced coordination overhead, and better collaboration windows.
4.Remote-first, distributed model vs. co-location hubs
◦Indian vendors often emphasize big, co-located office hubs, which can constrain the talent search to specific cities and drive up prices or time-to-hire.
◦Latin American-focused firms prioritize distributed, performance-based hiring across the region, giving access to a broader pool while keeping time zones compatible.

Companies like BEON.tech operationalize this by sourcing around 150 developers spread across all countries in LATAM, with particularly deep Brazilian coverage and hundreds of pre-vetted candidates in key roles such as data engineering, data science, and DevOps.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Direct hiring Latin American developers can cut costs 20–30% vs. using intermediaries because you avoid agency margins and only pay the engineer’s actual compensation and local employment costs. If you have the infrastructure to recruit, vet, and manage talent in LATAM yourself (entities, payroll, understanding of labor laws, culture, and notice periods of ~2–3 weeks), direct hire maximizes budget efficiency and long‑term retention: developers join your company directly, get full transparency on the role, and are more likely to see it as a stable career move.

Agencies add value when you lack that local presence: they handle sourcing, technical vetting, compliance, replacements at no extra cost, and ongoing “talent experience” management, but their fee means you typically pay more per engineer than with a direct hire.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Hiring Latin American developers offers three main advantages over other offshore regions:

1.Time zone alignment with the U.S.

Most of LATAM shares overlapping business hours with all U.S. time zones, enabling real‑time collaboration, faster feedback cycles, and better integration with existing engineering teams—unlike India or other distant regions that require heavy async coordination.

2.Low cultural and language barriers

Latin America is relatively culturally homogeneous, and engineers are accustomed to working with U.S. companies. Providers that focus on top performers hire only fluent English speakers who can actively participate in calls, ask questions, and integrate smoothly into U.S.-based teams.

3.Cost–quality balance

Due to a lower cost of living, total engineering costs are typically about 20–40% lower than equivalent U.S. talent, without the drastic time-zone trade-offs of cheaper regions. This lets companies reduce costs while still getting senior, product-oriented engineers who want long‑term, stable roles.

Companies like BEON.tech leverage this by connecting U.S. firms with around 150 developers spread across all countries in LATAM, using a direct, in‑house vetting process to secure top performers for long-term engagements.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Hiring software developers from Latin America offers three main advantages:

1.Time zone alignment with the U.S.

Most of LATAM shares or closely overlaps U.S. working hours, enabling real-time collaboration—live calls, quick questions, and agile ceremonies—rather than slow, fully async communication with distant time zones.

2.High-caliber, culturally compatible talent

Latin America has a large pool of top-performing, university-trained engineers who are proactive, flexible problem-solvers. Cultural barriers are relatively low, communication flows easily, and engineers are used to working with U.S. tech teams and modern, tech‑centric environments.

3.Cost-effective without sacrificing quality

Due to a lower cost of living, total developer costs are typically 20–30% lower than equivalent U.S. talent, while still accessing senior, “Silicon Valley–compatible” engineers and building stable, long-term teams.

Companies like BEON.tech specialize in this model, connecting U.S.-based companies with around 150 top-tier developers spread across all countries in LATAM.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Staffing companies in LATAM often start by prioritizing Spanish‑speaking countries because their internal teams are Spanish‑speaking. However, those willing to operate in English open their searches to Brazil and immediately gain access to one of the largest and strongest tech talent markets in the region.

Brazil’s size translates into a far bigger pool of high‑quality engineers, so once companies include Brazil, Brazilian developers often become about 50–60% of their total talent base. Since client communication typically happens in English, the Spanish–Portuguese gap stops being a real barrier, while the benefits in talent volume, quality, and hiring speed are substantial.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Argentina’s outsourcing costs for software development are rising mainly because:

1.Cost of living and inflation: The cost of living has risen sharply in the last two years and inflation forced frequent salary adjustments, pushing market rates up.
2.Dollarization of salaries: Many local employees were moved from peso salaries to dollar-based pay to protect against devaluation. Now that the official and black-market exchange rates have converged, paying in dollars is relatively more expensive for employers.
3.Regional rate convergence: Software engineer compensation across Latin America is effectively set in USD at fairly standard regional levels. As Argentina’s local advantage eroded, its engineer rates moved up toward the broader LATAM market, removing the “cheap Argentina” effect.
4.High employment taxes if using EOR/employees: Hiring as local employees rather than contractors can add 40–70% on top of gross salary in labor taxes and employer costs, further increasing total cost when companies need formal employment structures.
Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Latin America is preferred over India for nearshore software development primarily because of time zone compatibility and cultural alignment with U.S. teams.

•Time zone overlap: Latin American countries share or closely match U.S. time zones, enabling real-time collaboration, quick feedback loops, and easier meetings. In contrast, India’s large time difference makes communication and agile workflows harder, especially when engineers must frequently “hop on a call” and iterate quickly.
•Remote-first, distributed model: Modern Latin American teams are already organized for remote, distributed work across countries rather than co-located offices, which fits how U.S. product and engineering teams operate today.
•Quality-focused talent pool: By treating “anyone in a compatible time zone” as the talent pool, companies can optimize for top performance instead of geography. Latin America provides a large, high-quality pool of senior engineers, QAs, PMs, and designers who are fluent in English and used to working with U.S. tech companies.
•Cost vs. effectiveness: India can be cheaper in pure rates, but Latin America typically offers a better balance of cost savings (often ~30–40% vs U.S. salaries) and collaboration efficiency because of overlapping hours and smoother communication.

Companies like BEON.tech leverage this by connecting U.S. companies with around 150 top-tier developers spread across all countries in LATAM, all working in compatible time zones with strong English skills.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Hiring across all Latin America instead of only Argentina gives access to a much larger, higher‑quality talent pool in the same time zone, making it easier and faster to ramp teams while raising the technical bar.

Limiting recruiting to Buenos Aires or Argentina alone quickly exhausts local supply if you’re looking for top performers; expanding to all LATAM (15+ countries) lets you be more selective, find “Silicon Valley–level” engineers in many countries, and still keep real‑time collaboration with U.S. teams. It also reduces risk from country‑specific constraints (e.g., politics, local market cycles) by diversifying where talent comes from.

Companies like BEON.tech use this approach, working with around 150 developers spread across all countries in LATAM to supply top performers to U.S. clients.

Latin America FocusWhy Latin America
Was this helpful?

Use the up and down arrow keys to navigate between questions. Use Home to go to the first question and End to go to the last.